Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Jeffrey Asbestos Mine in Canada Seeks State Aid to Restart Production

Mr. Coulombe, 69, says he believes that you can recapture the past. At a time when Canada, like many countries, is spending millions of dollars to remove asbestos from buildings, to say nothing of covering asbestos-related disability claims, Mr. Coulombe wants a $58 million loan guarantee from the province of Quebec. He is hoping to attract investors and revitalize the mine that gave rise to the town in 1879 and for more than a century has swallowed chunks of it into its ever-expanding pit.

Adding to the controversy over the plan, Mr. Coulombe’s strategy is to sell to countries like India, Pakistan and Vietnam, where enthusiasm for cheap asbestos often comes with a lax approach to workplace health and safety.

It would seem a quixotic venture. Mr. Coulombe’s proposal has been widely condemned by the medical and public health community both in Canada and abroad. The mineral’s dangers have largely eliminated the market for it in Canada as well as the United States, where the last asbestos mine closed in 2002.

But while many Canadians outside Quebec view the mine’s survival as something of an international embarrassment, history suggests it would be unwise to dismiss Mr. Coulombe. The asbestos industry was once a prominent symbol of Quebec’s might in natural resources, and the mine — now known as Mine Jeffrey — played an outsize role in the province’s political history.

“The whole asbestos debate is purely emotional,” said Paul Lapierre, the vice president for cancer control at the Canadian Cancer Society and an opponent of Mr. Coulombe’s proposal. “As Quebeckers we were once so proud of our mining industry, including asbestos.”

The political strength of asbestos will be tested this month when the province is expected to announce a decision on the loan guarantee.

Jeffrey was once a key operation of Johns Manville, the American building materials company, and at one time provided most of the world’s supply of one type of asbestos. But over time a large body of scientific evidence linked it to lung cancer and mesothelioma, a fast-acting cancer of major organs, and asbestosis, a hardening of the lungs that ultimately suffocates its victims.

In 1982, health-related lawsuits forced Johns Manville into bankruptcy; the Jeffrey mine was sold to its managers a year later.

The fortunes of asbestos have continued to sink. After peaking at 4.79 million metric tons in 1977, worldwide production reached only 1.97 million metric tons last year. Some countries, including the members of the European Union, now ban the mineral’s general use. Synthetic fibers have assumed most of the tasks it once handled, if at a higher cost. Asbestos’s remaining markets are mainly less developed nations as well as China and the countries of the former Soviet Union and China, some of which have mines. Its one remaining attraction is its low cost.

Once it reaches developing countries, asbestos from the Jeffrey mine is usually mixed with cement and formed into inexpensive pipes and roof sheeting.

The town of Asbestos, once prosperous, has tracked the mineral’s decline. The former town hall sits abandoned. When repairs to the building proved unaffordable, the local government moved into a church it purchased for $1. The mine pit, which is about a mile wide and 1.2 miles long, and its two huge mills are currently inactive.

As he rapped on a wall in his shabby office, Mr. Coulombe, an engineer who joined the mine 42 years ago, lamented that its asbestos-based wallboard was no longer available.

Mr. Coulombe readily acknowledges the mineral’s dangers and the harm it has done. But he asserted that the trouble mainly resulted from other forms of asbestos and not the variety, known as chrysotile, produced at Jeffrey as well as operations in nearby Thetford Mines. “The people against us in the medical community, they know nothing about chrysotile,” Mr. Coulombe said. “We show our opponents all sorts of studies done over the last 25 years all around the world that demonstrate that there is no problem working with chrysotile. But they don’t take that into account. They say ‘It’s a carcinogen, it’s a carcinogen, it’s a carcinogen.’ ”


View the original article here

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Book Review - My Father’s Fortune - By Michael Frayn

Illustration by Joon Mo Kang, photographs by Colin McPherson/Corbis, left, and courtesy of Michael Frayn

Contemporary British letters do not lack for memoirs, autobiographies and other works in which the main event is the father-son relationship. John Mortimer’s wonderful play “A Voyage Round My Father,” about his dad, a celebrated, blind barrister; Max Hastings’s funny and touching “Did You Really Shoot the Television?,” about his feckless but irresistible father; Auberon Waugh’s sublimely titled “Will This Do?,” about life with Evelyn, who comes off (to my mind, anyway) as the Dad From Hell; then there is Auberon’s own son Alexander’s superb multigenerational layer-cake memoir, featuring ­Auberon-Evelyn-Arthur; Martin Amis’s nuanced but adoring portrait of his dad, Kingsley; and most recently Christopher Hitchens’s brilliant “Hitch-22,” featuring his complex, fraught relationship with his father, Commander Hitchens of the Royal Navy. Rich terrain — and I’ve probably omitted a dozen or so others.

In order to view this feature, you must download the latest version of flash player here. Tom Frayn with Michael and his sister, Jill, in 1937.

Tom Frayn, Michael and his sister, Jill, are joined by Michael’s mother, Violet; her mother, Nell Lawson; and an uncle, Sid Bubbers, in 1943.

Comes now Michael Frayn’s “My Father’s Fortune,” about his dad. Frayn says at the outset that his father has been dead for 40 years and that he wrote the book at the urging of his 47-year-old daughter, Rebecca, who wanted to know more about her antecedents. One senses that Frayn was initially reticent about the project; but by the time it ends, as many such books do, on a confessional, apologetic note, you feel his relief at having gotten it out. Rebecca owes her dad a kiss and a big thank-you.

Michael Frayn is probably best known in the United States for his hugely successful 1982 comedy, “Noises Off,” which was nominated for a Tony Award for best play. He is probably next-best-known here for his drama “Copenhagen,” about — as Monty Python used to put it, “and now for something completely different” — an encounter in 1941 between the German physicist Werner Heisenberg and the Danish physicist Niels Bohr. It won the Tony for best play in 2000.

Frayn boasts a résumé that would make even Gore Vidal feel inadequate (well, maybe not). Fifteen plays; 10 novels; screenplays; he’s translated Chekhov and Tolstoy and won so many literary awards and medals that if he wore them all at once, he’d look like one of those Soviet generals on top of Lenin’s tomb on May Day. He is, in so many words, a significant literary personage.

I had to keep reminding myself of this fact during the first 70 or so pages of this book. At one point, a line from Clive James’s review of Leonid Brezhnev’s memoirs, which is mentioned in “Hitch-22,” came to me: “Here is a book so dull that a whirling dervish could read himself to sleep with it. If you were to recite even a single page in the open air, birds would fall out of the sky and dogs drop dead.”

I hasten, indeed sprint, to qualify that somewhat impolite reference, for a few pages later, Frayn’s book kicked in and began to engage. It is not his fault that, as he puts it, “my father moved lightly over the earth, scarcely leaving a footprint, scarcely a shadow.” Yet the problem remains — turning Tom Frayn’s life story into compelling stuff. That said, by the end, it has become compelling. And with a dramatist’s sure touch, Frayn introduces a ticking hand grenade on Page 107 that may have you saying to yourself: “Oh. My. God.” Any translator of Chekhov is familiar with Chekhov’s rule: introduce a rifle in Act I, and it must be fired by Act III.

I don’t want to spoil it for you, but there’s no point in being coy, so here it is: It turns out Dad works for a company that makes asbestos roofing and piping. Not only that, but he’s constantly bringing home asbestos samples — huge chunks and slabs of pressed carcinogenic material from which the family makes (one cringes) myriad household items. Young Michael makes toys out of the stuff, hacksawing away at it, merrily filling the air with asbestos particles. My “Oh. My. God” moment came when they started making tomato planters out of it. Alas, the rifle does go off in Act III, but not quite as ­expected.

Frayn’s childhood was a mix, or, to use one of his logophile father’s favorite words, gallimaufry: a bit of Dickens, a bit of Wodehouse. He was 10 years old in 1943 and thus had a front-row seat at the blitz and the buzz bombing. He relates vivid and hairy memories of the “doodlebugs,” the improbably cute nickname given to the V-1 missiles that annihilated 6,000 Britons and wounded tens of thousands more.

His mother dropped dead of a heart attack in November 1945, having survived the war. He and his younger sister, Jill, were not allowed to attend the funeral, presumably on the grounds it might upset them. Their father wasn’t emotionally frigid, exactly, but neither was he a ­hugger.

“I suppose that he loved my mother,” Frayn writes. “And loved me and my sister, though he never said. Perhaps, it occurs to me now with a shock of surprise, he loved us as blindly and helplessly as years later I love my own children — was filled with the same joy at the sight of us as I am at the sight of them.”

Dad remarries a whack job named Elsie, the widow of a tinned-ham entrepreneur. The Frayns’ modest living standard suddenly rises to the level of petite bourgeoisie as they move from a rented home named Duckmore into nicer digs named Chez Nous. For a time, Elsie is Lady Bountiful, cheerful and loving and dispensing pound notes from her handbag — until we discover that she suffers from what we now call bipolar disorder. Michael spends the balance of his father’s second marriage tiptoeing around Chez Nous on eggshells.

But by now Michael is in secondary school, where his keen intellect is nurtured by a Mr. Chips type nicknamed Gobbo, the kind of teacher who makes a critical difference in a young man’s life. Frayn forms a close male attachment — not homo­sexual (oddly, for a British memoir) — with a fellow student named Lane. Years later, Lane, now a sen­ior civil servant in Canada (that must have been an exciting life), rebukes his old pal for having spoken publicly about their friendship and saying that it had “homoerotic overtones.”

With the help of an assiduous and beguiling crammer (tutor), Frayn matriculates at Cambridge, somewhat to the disappointment of Frayn Sr., who had hoped his son would follow him into the — gasp — asbestos business. After he graduates with a perfectly respectable 2.1 degree (a “first” being the best), his father can only shake his head. “I knew it wouldn’t come to anything, going to Cambridge.” But by then Frayn has already gotten a reporting job on The Manchester Guardian. Modestly, he barely says a word about his later successes.

And there the story does not end. There is redemption. There’s a heart-rending deathbed scene. And the rifle — hand grenade, doodlebug, whatever — that has been introduced on Page 107 finally goes off, casting a terrible pall.

In the final pages, Frayn, who in addition to Russian well knows his Greek and Latin, writes of his father, “I have borne him as best I could out of the ashes of the past in the way that the pious Aeneas bore his father Anchises on his back out of the ashes of Troy, in those pages of Virgil that fluttered away in the wind so many years ago.”

This is beautiful writing. This is Michael Frayn’s gift, not so much to his father, who one guesses would probably just have shrugged, but to a daughter who wanted to know what it had all been like. Rebecca’s fortune is quite a large one. h

Christopher Buckley’s latest book is “Losing Mum and Pup: A Memoir.”


View the original article here

Monday, November 21, 2011

W.R. Grace and Co. Executives Plead Not Guilty

W.R. Grace and Co. Executives Plead Not Guilty - Asbestos & Mesothelioma NewsAsbestos & Mesothelioma TodayWe can help you. Call (800) 490-6014

Asbestos Today is an online magazine that aggregates the latest asbestos and mesothelioma news, since 2003.
Asbestos Today RSS FeedSite Navigation
Asbestos News
Contact a Mesothelioma AttorneySpecial Report
Understanding Asbestos & MesotheliomaAsbestos facts:Asbestos exposure and risk:How can families reduce the risk of exposure to asbestos?How can asbestos affect my health?What is mesothelioma?How is mesothelioma treated?Asbestos medical testingAsbestos Related DiseasesNews Archives
September 2006
October 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
News Search

Contact Us
information [at] asbestostoday dot comW.R. Grace and Co. Executives Plead Not Guilty

Former Grace executives plead not guilty to charges that they knowingly endangering residents of Libby, Montana, and concealed information about the health affects of its asbestos mining operations.

Standing shoulder-to-shoulder, six W.R. Grace and Co. executives and their dozen-plus lawyers appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Leif Erickson on Tuesday to plead not guilty to charges that they knowingly concealed information about the deadly health effects of their company's vermiculite mine in Libby.

The defendants are also accused of obstructing the government's cleanup efforts and wire fraud. To date, according to the indictment, approximately 1,200 residents of Libby area have been identified as suffering from some kind of asbestos-related abnormality.

News Source: Billings Gazette  |  Published: February 28, 2005  |  Read Full Story Contact an Asbestos and Mesothelioma Attorney, Lawyer, Law Firm Please fill out the form below to contact an attorney. Provide as much information as possible to speed the processing of your inquiry (Only United States residents are eligible). Contact Information   *Are required items. *First Name: *Last Name: Email Address: *Daytime Phone: Evening Phone: *Zip Code: Case Information Have you, or the person you are contacting us on behalf of, been diagnosed with mesothelioma: Yes:   No: Date of diagnosis:

*Comments: (Please describe your legal issues and needs.)

Terms I understand submission of information submission of information for review does not create, is not intended to create, and must not be relied upon as creating, an attorney-client relationship. I understand such a relationship can only be created by the agreement of both the client and the attorney, evidenced by a written retainer agreement that has been signed by client and counter-signed by the attorney.By submitting your expression of interest you are consenting to receive telephone calls from participating law firms even if you are currently on the do-not-call list. *I Agree to these terms: All contents copyright ©2008, eJustice All rights reserved. Asbestos Today is part of the eJustice Network. Your use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Asbestos Today Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

View the original article here

Monday, November 7, 2011

Mesothelioma Community Will Convene to Focus on Cure

SANTA BARBARA, Calif., Sept. 22 /PRNewswire/ -- The urgent mission to improve treatments for a deadly, asbestos-related cancer will make another step forward, the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation (MARF) announced today, with the Second International Symposium on Malignant Mesothelioma.

Meso is a malignant tumor that aggressively invades the linings of the lungs, abdomen, heart or testicles. The need for research to develop effective treatments was neglected for decades. But in the past few years, exciting progress has begun. MARF, the national nonprofit whose mission is to eradicate meso as a life-ending disease, has organized the Symposium to review this progress, elucidate the latest advances, and strengthen and encourage the entire meso community.

The Symposium will be held in Las Vegas at the Caesars Palace convention center, October 6 through 8. Following the highly successful 2004 format, the program combines highly relevant material for the patient/family and advocacy communities with scientific presentations by leading experts on the latest in meso science and treatment.

The Symposium will open powerfully with presentations on the scope of the mesothelioma tragedy and the continuing threat, by Dr. Stephen Levin from the renowned Mount Sinai Irving Selikoff Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, author and Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Andrew Schneider, and international experts Michael Harbut and Michele Carbone.

Sessions focused specifically for patients and caregivers will cover the clinical aspects of the disease and its treatment, including surgery, chemotherapy, experimental treatments, and pain management. Extended break-out sessions are planned for patients, caregivers and the bereaved, to offer holistic strategies for the emotional, physical and psychological aspects of the disease.

Major scientific topics will include evolving diagnostic, prognostic and staging technologies, including the latest in early detection. Multi-modal management -- surgery, radio and chemotherapy -- will be covered in detail for both pleural and peritoneal meso. Systemic chemotherapy protocols will be reviewed, including an assessment of the Alimta/Cisplatin regimen. Second line and novel treatment approaches will be discussed, along with a thorough overview of meso research projects currently underway. Participating physicians will receive CME credits for these sessions. Patients, family members and other non-medical professionals are also welcome to attend.

News Source: PR Newswire  |  Published: October 3, 2005  |  Read Full Story

View the original article here

Friday, October 28, 2011

James Hardie Industries Faces US Asbestos Lawsuits

James Hardie Industries Faces US Asbestos Lawsuits - Asbestos & Mesothelioma NewsAsbestos & Mesothelioma TodayWe can help you. Call (800) 490-6014

Asbestos Today is an online magazine that aggregates the latest asbestos and mesothelioma news, since 2003.
Asbestos Today RSS FeedSite Navigation
Asbestos News
Contact a Mesothelioma AttorneySpecial Report
Understanding Asbestos & MesotheliomaAsbestos facts:Asbestos exposure and risk:How can families reduce the risk of exposure to asbestos?How can asbestos affect my health?What is mesothelioma?How is mesothelioma treated?Asbestos medical testingAsbestos Related DiseasesNews Archives
September 2006
October 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
News Search

Contact Us
information [at] asbestostoday dot comJames Hardie Industries Faces US Asbestos Lawsuits

The Australian reports the James Hardie Industries faces lawsuits in the United States, specifically California, by former employees who handled Asbestos. The bigger story is that James Hardie Industries may have asbestos liability in the United States.

The workers were employed by Californian distributor Industrial Building Materials Inc, which they claim imported and installed Hardie asbestos products. Mr Kazan's firm has won a number of similar cases in the past.
News Source: The Australian  |  Published: February 21, 2005  |  Read Full Story Contact an Asbestos and Mesothelioma Attorney, Lawyer, Law Firm Please fill out the form below to contact an attorney. Provide as much information as possible to speed the processing of your inquiry (Only United States residents are eligible). Contact Information   *Are required items. *First Name: *Last Name: Email Address: *Daytime Phone: Evening Phone: *Zip Code: Case Information Have you, or the person you are contacting us on behalf of, been diagnosed with mesothelioma: Yes:   No: Date of diagnosis:

*Comments: (Please describe your legal issues and needs.)

Terms I understand submission of information submission of information for review does not create, is not intended to create, and must not be relied upon as creating, an attorney-client relationship. I understand such a relationship can only be created by the agreement of both the client and the attorney, evidenced by a written retainer agreement that has been signed by client and counter-signed by the attorney.By submitting your expression of interest you are consenting to receive telephone calls from participating law firms even if you are currently on the do-not-call list. *I Agree to these terms: All contents copyright ©2008, eJustice All rights reserved. Asbestos Today is part of the eJustice Network. Your use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Asbestos Today Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

View the original article here

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

New York City’s Inspection Scandal

New Yorkers are rightly alarmed at the ease with which an inspector who was licensed to test buildings and construction sites for lead or asbestos risks got away with filing hundreds of false reports for at least a decade. The Bloomberg administration says reforms that were already in progress when the deception was uncovered will make it less likely to happen in the future.

But the jaw-dropping scope of the fraud carried out by just one inspector raises legitimate concerns about city oversight. It also raises the possibility of collusion between builders and property owners and the inspectors they hire to perform legally required safety tests.

The inspector, Saverio Todaro, who was at one point certified by city, state and federal agencies, operated a company through which he claimed to perform environmental inspection and testing services, including lead clearance testing, asbestos air monitoring and asbestos inspection in the New York City area. Favorable reports allow property owners to certify that their apartments presented no lead risks to young children or that proposed demolition projects would be asbestos-free. That means they do not require special filings with the city or costly abatement efforts.

As William K. Rashbaum reported in The Times on Tuesday, Mr. Todaro submitted results for more than 200 buildings and apartments, including some renovated for the city’s affordable housing initiative, without performing a single test.

The city environmental agency suspended Mr. Todaro’s license in 2004 but failed to notify other public agencies for which he did asbestos-related work. As a result, he continued to file reports until 2008, when an employee of the city’s health department noticed a suspicious pattern in his work.

City officials say that they would notify other agencies of suspensions and irregularities in the future. The city also says it is well on the way to a system that will make it impossible for inspectors who have been suspended from filing subsequent reports.

City Hall should also consider strengthening and consolidating oversight of the testing regime, which currently is spread across several city agencies.


View the original article here

Friday, September 23, 2011

N.Y.C. Inspector Sentenced for Faking Safety Tests

The case against the inspector, Saverio F. Todaro, who pleaded guilty in March to mail fraud, environmental crimes and making false statements, and the breadth and simplicity of his offenses revealed the city’s system of oversight and enforcement as strained at best and raised questions about whether such improper conduct was more widespread.

Mr. Todaro never performed hundreds of tests but filed false reports and failed to submit laboratory reports in some instances.

At the sentencing in United States District Court in Manhattan, Mr. Todaro, a wizened 68-year-old, sat hunched over in a wheelchair, breathing with the aid of an oxygen tank and sometimes holding his hand to his head as his lawyer argued for a sentence of home detention.

The lawyer, Steven M. Statsinger, acknowledged that his client’s crimes had been “unusually severe,” because they occurred over a long period of time — more than seven years — and had the potential to affect so many people. But he cited his severe health problems and his mentally retarded 40-year-old son; Mr. Todaro, he said, had a very close relationship with his son and helped care for him.

But the judge, Kimba M. Wood, told Mr. Todaro before she sentenced him that only his son’s needs and his own poor health kept her from giving him a “much, much higher” sentence. The prison term she meted out, five years and three months, was at the top of the range of advisory guidelines.

She also said he had concocted an elaborate web of lies to evade detection and avoid prosecution.

“The inventiveness of your lies,” she said, “was outstripped only by the callousness with which you put the health and lives of New York City children and adults at risk.”

Judge Wood ordered Mr. Todaro, a certified asbestos investigator, to pay more than $450,000 in forfeiture, fines and restitution.

In a brief and somewhat disjointed statement, Mr. Todaro apologized and asked the judge not to send him to prison.

“Basically, look, I’m sorry what I did,” he said. “I’m sorry the effect it’s had on my family, my relatives, clients, everybody. I feel really bad about it. And it’s been on my mind.

“I am sympathetic to everything I’ve done, the people I hurt, but if I go to jail my wife cannot keep the house up, my kid wouldn’t be taken care of. And what else can I say?”

The prosecutor in the case said in court papers that in all but a few instances, it was impossible to say whether the fake reports masked real environmental hazards. “It is unknown whether people will get sick as a result of his conduct,” wrote Anne C. Ryan, an assistant in the office of Preet Bharara, the United States attorney in Manhattan. “Among other things, asbestos-related diseases can take decades to develop.”

Judge Wood told Mr. Todaro that the health of the city’s children and adults was heavily dependent on the honesty of inspectors. “Your sentence needs to send a message to all city inspectors that they are guardians of the public trust and that dishonesty in inspections will be severely punished,” she said.

William V. Lometti, who is in charge of the criminal investigative division of the Environmental Protection Agency in New York, said the sentence did that.

In July, in response to the case, the city announced a range of reforms to increase oversight and enforcement.


View the original article here

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Debate Continues Over Deutsche Bank Tower Demolition

But in a hint of what will follow the demolition, the construction manager for the dismantling, Bovis Lend Lease, is involved in a courtroom free-for-all over tens of millions of dollars with the state agency that hired it.

Bovis claimed in a complaint filed last month in State Supreme Court in Manhattan that it had been shortchanged at least $80 million for work it was ordered to perform at the site.

But in a court filing on June 23, the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation excoriated the construction company for having the “gall” to seek extra compensation and profit, despite the project’s “being more than three and a half years behind schedule and despite tens of millions of dollars of costs and damages” incurred by the agency from long delays and an August 2007 blaze in which two firefighters died.

“There are two Bovises,” Avi Schick, chairman of the development corporation, said. “One that speaks with contrition and accepts responsibility for its safety lapses on the site, and then there’s the other Bovis with its hand in the taxpayer’s pocket.”

Bovis declined to discuss the specifics of the claims.

“We are pleased with the progress being made to bring the building down,” said Mary Costello, a spokeswoman for Bovis, “and look forward to the completion of the project and to the resolution of any open issues with L.M.D.C."

There are some facts on which the two sides agree. The 41-story Deutsche Bank tower at 130 Liberty Street sustained a 15-story gash on the north side of the building during the Sept. 11 attack on the World Trade Center. The development corporation bought the building in 2004 and hired Bovis the following year to decontaminate and demolish it under an $81 million contract.

The costs of demolition are covered by a combination of government money and $100 million from insurers, with the total expected to run about $300 million.

Regulators imposed a complicated protocol for cleaning the tower, which they suspected had been contaminated by asbestos and other toxic substances. But from the beginning, the work was plagued by delays, accidents and financial disputes.

In its lawsuit, Bovis said the work had been more difficult and expensive than anticipated, in large part because of “outside regulatory interference and changed work methods imposed by government regulators.”

Bovis claimed that it had repeatedly been ordered by the agency to do work outside the scope of its contract, for which it should be compensated “with a reasonable markup for overhead and profit.”

The development corporation countered that Bovis had assumed the risk of regulatory scrutiny when it signed the contract. Yet, the corporation added, Bovis was paid $61 million more than the contract called for after the contractor threatened to walk off the job if its demands were not met. Furthermore, the development corporation said that the Bovis lawsuit was premature because both sides had agreed in 2007 to defer any litigation until demolition was finished.


View the original article here

Friday, August 26, 2011

Georgia Supreme Court Rules on Asbestos Liability Lawsuits

Georgia Supreme Court Rules on Asbestos Liability Lawsuits - Asbestos & Mesothelioma NewsAsbestos & Mesothelioma TodayWe can help you. Call (800) 490-6014

Asbestos Today is an online magazine that aggregates the latest asbestos and mesothelioma news, since 2003.
Asbestos Today RSS FeedSite Navigation
Asbestos News
Contact a Mesothelioma AttorneySpecial Report
Understanding Asbestos & MesotheliomaAsbestos facts:Asbestos exposure and risk:How can families reduce the risk of exposure to asbestos?How can asbestos affect my health?What is mesothelioma?How is mesothelioma treated?Asbestos medical testingAsbestos Related DiseasesNews Archives
September 2006
October 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
News Search

Contact Us
information [at] asbestostoday dot comGeorgia Supreme Court Rules on Asbestos Liability Lawsuits

Georgia Supreme Court ruled that family members of employees who are exposed to asbestos in the workplace cannot sue the employer as a result of coming into contact with the employees clothes away from the workplace.

The court concluded that "the holding in Widera is consistent with negligence law in Georgia" and that "an employer does not owe a duty of care to a third-party non-employee who comes into contact with its employee's asbestos-tainted work clothing at locations away from the workplace."
News Source: hr.blr.com  |  Published: February 28, 2005  |  Read Full Story Contact an Asbestos and Mesothelioma Attorney, Lawyer, Law Firm Please fill out the form below to contact an attorney. Provide as much information as possible to speed the processing of your inquiry (Only United States residents are eligible). Contact Information   *Are required items. *First Name: *Last Name: Email Address: *Daytime Phone: Evening Phone: *Zip Code: Case Information Have you, or the person you are contacting us on behalf of, been diagnosed with mesothelioma: Yes:   No: Date of diagnosis:

*Comments: (Please describe your legal issues and needs.)

Terms I understand submission of information submission of information for review does not create, is not intended to create, and must not be relied upon as creating, an attorney-client relationship. I understand such a relationship can only be created by the agreement of both the client and the attorney, evidenced by a written retainer agreement that has been signed by client and counter-signed by the attorney.By submitting your expression of interest you are consenting to receive telephone calls from participating law firms even if you are currently on the do-not-call list. *I Agree to these terms: All contents copyright ©2008, eJustice All rights reserved. Asbestos Today is part of the eJustice Network. Your use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Asbestos Today Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

View the original article here

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Madison Square Garden Reopens After Asbestos Scare

Players and coaches had long since left the building. They were still digesting the previous warning — an asbestos scare at Madison Square Garden that forced the postponement of a home game Tuesday night.

Like the fire alarm, the asbestos warning appears to have been unwarranted, and the Knicks will soon resume their normal schedule.

Garden officials announced Wednesday evening that the arena had been deemed safe and that all events would go on as scheduled. The Knicks will play the Washington Wizards there Friday night.

In a statement, the Garden said it had received “assurance from the city and environmental experts regarding the safety of the arena.”

The statement said nothing about asbestos, the word that initially set off concerns after some debris fell from the Garden attic during overnight maintenance Monday. Tests conducted by the city’s Department of Environmental Protection and by independent contractors concluded that no asbestos had been released into the arena.

Garden officials, exercising what they called “an abundance of caution,” postponed Tuesday night’s game between the Knicks and the Orlando Magic. The teams are working with the N.B.A. to schedule a makeup date.

The decision to reopen the arena was made by Garden officials alone. The city’s oversight effectively ended once testing concluded that there was no asbestos in the arena.

“It’s essentially in their hands,” Farrell Sklerov, a spokesman for the D.E.P., said earlier in the afternoon. He added, “There’s no health risk.”

Had the Garden remained closed, the Knicks would have been forced to postpone more home games or play them at another site, probably in New Jersey. Garden officials made initial inquiries with the Prudential Center in Newark, but never made firm plans to play there.

On Wednesday, the Knicks seemed more concerned with cleaning up their offense and their record (1-2) than their aging arena. They lost close games to Boston and Portland last week, outcomes that left them with equal doses of frustration and hope. The tough schedule continues Thursday night in Chicago against the talent-rich Bulls.

So Tuesday’s postponement, however inconvenient, was not all bad. It gave three key players — Anthony Randolph (sprained ankle), Ronny Turiaf (sore back) and Danilo Gallinari (sore wrist) — extra time to heal.

It also allowed the Knicks to avoid, for now, a difficult matchup with Orlando’s Dwight Howard, perhaps the league’s most fearsome big man. The running joke was that the Knicks finally found a way to shut down Howard.

“One of my better coaching performances,” Coach Mike D’Antoni said, chuckling. He added: “It was either Dwight Howard or breathing bad material. It’s a tossup.”

D’Antoni said that his young team might be more ready for the challenge by the time the Knicks see the Magic.

Several players came to the training center to work out or shoot on their own. But the unexpected postponement left them with a free night and an empty feeling.

“It was tough,” Amar’e Stoudemire said. “I mean, we definitely was ready to play, was prepared for Orlando, was geared up, ready to go.”

The players were either headed to the Garden or getting ready to leave their homes when they received word that the game had been postponed. Some players said they just relaxed and watched television. Some watched other N.B.A. games. D’Antoni said he watched game film of the Bulls.

“I wanted to play,” said Gallinari, who is eager to break out of a shooting slump. “I wanted to play the game. That was not good news.”

Gallinari was already on his way to Manhattan when he heard about the incident and decided to keep going. He walked around Central Park, visited the Apple Store on Fifth Avenue (to check out the iPad), then headed to SoHo for dinner at an Italian restaurant.

It was a nice way to spend an evening, just not what he had in mind. Like his teammates, Gallinari had never lost a game to 40-year-old fire retardant.

“Only in New York can that happen,” he said.


View the original article here

Sunday, July 31, 2011

The Cruel Saga of Asbestos Disease

The Cruel Saga of Asbestos Disease - Asbestos & Mesothelioma NewsAsbestos & Mesothelioma TodayWe can help you. Call (800) 490-6014

Asbestos Today is an online magazine that aggregates the latest asbestos and mesothelioma news, since 2003.
Asbestos Today RSS FeedSite Navigation
Asbestos News
Contact a Mesothelioma AttorneySpecial Report
Understanding Asbestos & MesotheliomaAsbestos facts:Asbestos exposure and risk:How can families reduce the risk of exposure to asbestos?How can asbestos affect my health?What is mesothelioma?How is mesothelioma treated?Asbestos medical testingAsbestos Related DiseasesNews Archives
September 2006
October 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
News Search

Contact Us
information [at] asbestostoday dot comThe Cruel Saga of Asbestos Disease

Paul Brodeur, a staff writer at the New Yorker, wrote a commentary piece for the LA Times providing us with an insightful look at what he calls The Cruel Saga of Asbestos Disease

In pioneering studies conducted in the 1960s, Selikoff demonstrated the horrific extent of asbestos lung disease in heavily exposed asbestos insulators. He then showed that asbestos disease was also striking less- exposed workers who toiled alongside the insulators in shipyards and on building construction sites. Other scientists found that the wives and children of asbestos workers were dying through exposure to the relatively small amounts of asbestos dust their husbands and fathers were bringing home on their work clothes.

Paul Brodeur has also written four books on asbestos disease:

The asbestos industry on trialOUTRAGEOUS MISCONDUCTAsbestos and enzymesThe asbestos hazardNews Source: LA Times  |  Published: February 21, 2005  |  Read Full Story Contact an Asbestos and Mesothelioma Attorney, Lawyer, Law Firm Please fill out the form below to contact an attorney. Provide as much information as possible to speed the processing of your inquiry (Only United States residents are eligible). Contact Information   *Are required items. *First Name: *Last Name: Email Address: *Daytime Phone: Evening Phone: *Zip Code: Case Information Have you, or the person you are contacting us on behalf of, been diagnosed with mesothelioma: Yes:   No: Date of diagnosis:

*Comments: (Please describe your legal issues and needs.)

Terms I understand submission of information submission of information for review does not create, is not intended to create, and must not be relied upon as creating, an attorney-client relationship. I understand such a relationship can only be created by the agreement of both the client and the attorney, evidenced by a written retainer agreement that has been signed by client and counter-signed by the attorney.By submitting your expression of interest you are consenting to receive telephone calls from participating law firms even if you are currently on the do-not-call list. *I Agree to these terms: All contents copyright ©2008, eJustice All rights reserved. Asbestos Today is part of the eJustice Network. Your use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Asbestos Today Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

View the original article here

Friday, July 15, 2011

Libby, Montana in the Aftermath of W.R. Grace and Co. Indictment

Libby, Montana in the Aftermath of W.R. Grace and Co. Indictment - Asbestos & Mesothelioma NewsAsbestos & Mesothelioma TodayWe can help you. Call (800) 490-6014

Asbestos Today is an online magazine that aggregates the latest asbestos and mesothelioma news, since 2003.
Asbestos Today RSS FeedSite Navigation
Asbestos News
Contact a Mesothelioma AttorneySpecial Report
Understanding Asbestos & MesotheliomaAsbestos facts:Asbestos exposure and risk:How can families reduce the risk of exposure to asbestos?How can asbestos affect my health?What is mesothelioma?How is mesothelioma treated?Asbestos medical testingAsbestos Related DiseasesNews Archives
September 2006
October 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
News Search

Contact Us
information [at] asbestostoday dot comLibby, Montana in the Aftermath of W.R. Grace and Co. Indictment

An AP story describes Libby, Montana in the aftermath of the W.R. Grace indictment.

Posters promise "Door Prizes!!" and "Blood draw to participate in ongoing research!" Companies that sell home oxygen supplies will send reps. Doctors and researchers will be here. There will be consultants to help asbestosis victims apply for public aid. And there will be advice on finding help with the housework when the disease becomes too much.

But the most interesting quote in the AP story comes from Ed Baker, a former city councilman, "He'd go back to work for them today if he was alive. My dad knew in the '60s that his lungs were turning to concrete. Like he always told me, he took his chances and he could have quit at anytime. But they were good jobs."

How many people feel that way in Libby, Montana? Probably not many family members, and 1200 victims who have been identified as suffering from some kind of asbestos-related abnormality.

W.R. Grace and its executives, as far back as the 1970's, attempted to conceal information about the adverse health effects of the company's vermiculite mining operations and distribution of vermiculite in the Libby, Montana community, according to the indictment.

The defendants are also accused of obstructing the government's cleanup efforts and wire fraud.

News Source: Associated Press  |  Published: February 21, 2005  |  Read Full Story Contact an Asbestos and Mesothelioma Attorney, Lawyer, Law Firm Please fill out the form below to contact an attorney. Provide as much information as possible to speed the processing of your inquiry (Only United States residents are eligible). Contact Information   *Are required items. *First Name: *Last Name: Email Address: *Daytime Phone: Evening Phone: *Zip Code: Case Information Have you, or the person you are contacting us on behalf of, been diagnosed with mesothelioma: Yes:   No: Date of diagnosis:

*Comments: (Please describe your legal issues and needs.)

Terms I understand submission of information submission of information for review does not create, is not intended to create, and must not be relied upon as creating, an attorney-client relationship. I understand such a relationship can only be created by the agreement of both the client and the attorney, evidenced by a written retainer agreement that has been signed by client and counter-signed by the attorney.By submitting your expression of interest you are consenting to receive telephone calls from participating law firms even if you are currently on the do-not-call list. *I Agree to these terms: All contents copyright ©2008, eJustice All rights reserved. Asbestos Today is part of the eJustice Network. Your use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Asbestos Today Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

View the original article here

Friday, May 20, 2011

mesothelioma - What is mesothelioma? find out about mesothelioma

Mesothelioma is a form of cancer that is almost always caused by previous exposure to asbestos.
In this disease, malignant cells develop in the mesothelium, a protective lining that covers most of the body's internal organs. Its most common site is the pleura (outer lining of the lungs and chest cavity), but it may also occur in the peritoneum (the lining of the abdominal cavity) or the pericardium (a sac that surrounds the heart).
Most people who develop mesothelioma have worked on jobs where they inhaled asbestos particles, or have been exposed to asbestos dust and fibre in other ways, such as by washing the clothes of a family member who worked with asbestos, or by home renovation using asbestos cement products. There is no association between mesothelioma and smoking.
View the original article here

W.R. Grace & Co. and New Jersey Dispute Asbestos Lawsuit Venue

W.R. Grace & Co. and New Jersey Dispute Asbestos Lawsuit Venue - Asbestos & Mesothelioma NewsAsbestos & Mesothelioma TodayWe can help you. Call (800) 490-6014

Asbestos Today is an online magazine that aggregates the latest asbestos and mesothelioma news, since 2003.
Asbestos Today RSS FeedSite Navigation
Asbestos News
Contact a Mesothelioma AttorneySpecial Report
Understanding Asbestos & MesotheliomaAsbestos facts:Asbestos exposure and risk:How can families reduce the risk of exposure to asbestos?How can asbestos affect my health?What is mesothelioma?How is mesothelioma treated?Asbestos medical testingAsbestos Related DiseasesNews Archives
September 2006
October 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
News Search

Contact Us
information [at] asbestostoday dot comW.R. Grace & Co. and New Jersey Dispute Asbestos Lawsuit Venue
TRENTON - W.R. Grace & Co. and the New Jersey attorney general are wrangling over what court will have jurisdiction over the state's civil suit against the Maryland-based construction products and chemical manufacturer.
The lawsuit, filed in state Superior Court this past summer, accuses the company of submitting false or misleading information to state regulators about the asbestos-tainted vermiculite it processed over the course of three decades at a fireproofing and insulation plant in Hamilton.
News Source: nj.com  |  Published: October 3, 2005  |  Read Full Story Contact an Asbestos and Mesothelioma Attorney, Lawyer, Law Firm Please fill out the form below to contact an attorney. Provide as much information as possible to speed the processing of your inquiry (Only United States residents are eligible). Contact Information   *Are required items. *First Name: *Last Name: Email Address: *Daytime Phone: Evening Phone: *Zip Code: Case Information Have you, or the person you are contacting us on behalf of, been diagnosed with mesothelioma: Yes:   No: Date of diagnosis:
*Comments: (Please describe your legal issues and needs.)
Terms I understand submission of information submission of information for review does not create, is not intended to create, and must not be relied upon as creating, an attorney-client relationship. I understand such a relationship can only be created by the agreement of both the client and the attorney, evidenced by a written retainer agreement that has been signed by client and counter-signed by the attorney.By submitting your expression of interest you are consenting to receive telephone calls from participating law firms even if you are currently on the do-not-call list. *I Agree to these terms: All contents copyright ©2008, eJustice All rights reserved. Asbestos Today is part of the eJustice Network. Your use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Asbestos Today Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
View the original article here

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Custodians file suit against UNLV

Custodians file suit against UNLV - Asbestos & Mesothelioma NewsAsbestos & Mesothelioma TodayWe can help you. Call (800) 490-6014

Asbestos Today is an online magazine that aggregates the latest asbestos and mesothelioma news, since 2003.
Asbestos Today RSS FeedSite Navigation
Asbestos News
Contact a Mesothelioma AttorneySpecial Report
Understanding Asbestos & MesotheliomaAsbestos facts:Asbestos exposure and risk:How can families reduce the risk of exposure to asbestos?How can asbestos affect my health?What is mesothelioma?How is mesothelioma treated?Asbestos medical testingAsbestos Related DiseasesNews Archives
September 2006
October 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
News Search

Contact Us
information [at] asbestostoday dot comCustodians file suit against UNLV
Giordano, now retired, filed in November a District Court lawsuit against UNLV alleging the institution knowingly allowed workers to clean asbestos fibers without proper safety equipment or training, according to the Review-Journal. About 40 plaintiffs have now joined the suit, the custodians' attorney told the R-J.
News Source: Rebel Yell  |  Published: February 17, 2005  |  Read Full Story Contact an Asbestos and Mesothelioma Attorney, Lawyer, Law Firm Please fill out the form below to contact an attorney. Provide as much information as possible to speed the processing of your inquiry (Only United States residents are eligible). Contact Information   *Are required items. *First Name: *Last Name: Email Address: *Daytime Phone: Evening Phone: *Zip Code: Case Information Have you, or the person you are contacting us on behalf of, been diagnosed with mesothelioma: Yes:   No: Date of diagnosis:
*Comments: (Please describe your legal issues and needs.)
Terms I understand submission of information submission of information for review does not create, is not intended to create, and must not be relied upon as creating, an attorney-client relationship. I understand such a relationship can only be created by the agreement of both the client and the attorney, evidenced by a written retainer agreement that has been signed by client and counter-signed by the attorney.By submitting your expression of interest you are consenting to receive telephone calls from participating law firms even if you are currently on the do-not-call list. *I Agree to these terms: All contents copyright ©2008, eJustice All rights reserved. Asbestos Today is part of the eJustice Network. Your use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Asbestos Today Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
View the original article here

Owens Corning Sets Up Asbestos Fund for Victims

Owens Corning Sets Up Asbestos Fund for Victims - Asbestos & Mesothelioma NewsAsbestos & Mesothelioma TodayWe can help you. Call (800) 490-6014

Asbestos Today is an online magazine that aggregates the latest asbestos and mesothelioma news, since 2003.
Asbestos Today RSS FeedSite Navigation
Asbestos News
Contact a Mesothelioma AttorneySpecial Report
Understanding Asbestos & MesotheliomaAsbestos facts:Asbestos exposure and risk:How can families reduce the risk of exposure to asbestos?How can asbestos affect my health?What is mesothelioma?How is mesothelioma treated?Asbestos medical testingAsbestos Related DiseasesNews Archives
September 2006
October 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
News Search

Contact Us
information [at] asbestostoday dot comOwens Corning Sets Up Asbestos Fund for Victims
To recover, claimants must be seriously ill from exposure to asbestos at a job site where Owens Corning's products were used. The spouses of people killed by exposure can also recover.
News Source: seattlepi.com  |  Published: September 25, 2006  |  Read Full Story Contact an Asbestos and Mesothelioma Attorney, Lawyer, Law Firm Please fill out the form below to contact an attorney. Provide as much information as possible to speed the processing of your inquiry (Only United States residents are eligible). Contact Information   *Are required items. *First Name: *Last Name: Email Address: *Daytime Phone: Evening Phone: *Zip Code: Case Information Have you, or the person you are contacting us on behalf of, been diagnosed with mesothelioma: Yes:   No: Date of diagnosis:
*Comments: (Please describe your legal issues and needs.)
Terms I understand submission of information submission of information for review does not create, is not intended to create, and must not be relied upon as creating, an attorney-client relationship. I understand such a relationship can only be created by the agreement of both the client and the attorney, evidenced by a written retainer agreement that has been signed by client and counter-signed by the attorney.By submitting your expression of interest you are consenting to receive telephone calls from participating law firms even if you are currently on the do-not-call list. *I Agree to these terms: All contents copyright ©2008, eJustice All rights reserved. Asbestos Today is part of the eJustice Network. Your use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Asbestos Today Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
View the original article here

CITY ROOM; On a Midtown Block, the Big Yellow-Toothed Face of Labor, Times Two

Tourists shuffling out of Grand Central Terminal would be forgiven for wondering what the heck kind of low-rent horror movie about giant rats is being filmed on East 42nd Street. Immobile, fat and grinning with big yellow teeth - yikes!
New Yorkers, of course, will recognize the big inflated pests, familiar sights all over town, wherever a labor union has taken umbrage with the goings-on at the location. The rat may stay an hour or a day or longer, with handy fliers explaining the nature of the dispute. Indeed, the rats are almost counterproductive among natives, who barely bother to look up and notice anymore, as with panhandlers and police sirens and smiling people who want you to stop in the middle of the sidewalk and sign something.
But rarer, far rarer, is the double rat sighting on a single block, as is the case on 42nd Street. Two rats face two different buildings as if they'd planned it that way and carpooled in together, which was not quite the case. The union that owns the rats, Asbestos, Lead and Hazardous Waste Laborers' Local 78, is protesting the means of asbestos abatement at 60 East 42nd Street and 315 Madison Avenue, which faces 42nd. The rats will be there all week.One of them is 15 feet tall and, like many real rats, nude, his long tail turned up between his legs. The other rat is three feet shorter but nattier, wearing a suit and tie and clutching two big bags of money. They are the whiskered face of labor in New York, like rodent Tom Joads, perched wherever there's a fight, so hungry people can eat. Wherever there's a cop beatin' up a guy, Ma
This week's rat double-billing requires two union men to stand watch all day.
''It's fun,'' said one, Juan Severino, 25, of the South Bronx, who has hauled the rats around for two years. ''You see the reactions of people. Some people hate us because we are disturbing the public. Some people love us. Tourists take pictures.''
Each rat's work day begins at 7 a.m., when 42nd Street is still relatively quiet. Mr. Severino parks his pickup on the curb and hauls out the deflated, folded-up rat, which rises only about knee high. He hooks it up to a fan, which in turn is hooked to a generator, into which he pours gasoline and yanks the start cord. The rat springs to life remarkably quickly, in seconds, and Mr. Severino ties it down to the subway grate on the sidewalk.
For a building's owners, the rat outside is just about as unwelcome as one running around inside.
''They always call the cops,'' Mr. Severino said. ''The first couple days are like that. It's intense.'' Then everybody gets used to one another, sort of like New Yorkers' resignation with, and even affection for, real rats. The big rats are street legal if they stay out of the road and they're not blocking the sidewalk. Mr. Severino said he and his partner pack the rats up around 3:30 p.m. A gallon of gas keeps one inflated for eight hours.
City Room left voice mail messages for the chief executives targeted by the Midtown rats.
The two rats are part of a stable for Local 78. There are two more rats that were perched at addresses in New Jersey on Wednesday, Mr. Severino said. And for those narrow sidewalks where the rats won't fit, the union mounts a coffin with a dummy inside.
Now, to be fair to those who think the rats are in a movie shoot, they might be on to something. A movie about inflated union rats that come to life and lead real rats in a siege of the city and chomp on people with their yellow teeth and wear nice suits and talk like Henry Fonda - yes, we would see that.
This is a more complete version of the story than the one that appeared in print.
PHOTO: Two inflated rats from Local 78 of the Asbestos, Lead and Hazardous Waste Laborers near Grand Central Terminal this week. (PHOTOGRAPH BY SUZANNE DeCHILLO/THE NEW YORK TIMES)

View the original article here

More Problems For Diagnosed Father

My father has been diagnosed and he has been notified that the treatment he needs is only available at a hospital away from home. He has insurance but it won’t pay for his travel, hotel, and expenses and the doctor is saying he will need to come to the hospital several day a week for six weeks or more. Any tips on what should he do about this situation?
Tagged as: Diagnosed Father, Mesothelioma, Mesothelioma Stories, Mesothelioma Treatment
View the original article here

Second International Mesothelioma Symposium

Fresh evidence of progress in the diagnosis and treatment of an aggressive asbestos-related cancer was the highlight of the Second International Symposium on Cancerous Mesothelioma last week. Long considered lethal, meso is a tumor that invades the linings of the lungs, abdomen, heart or testicles. The Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation (MARF) organizes the annual symposium, held this year in Las Vegas Nevada, to unite the meso community and focus on curing the disease.
Advances in detection, multimodal treatment, gene therapy, and immunotherapy were among the topics that thrilled the audience. Ann Ferrero, whose mother was diagnosed with meso a year ago, admitted that "Last year my entire family reeled from the shock." The information presented at the symposium, however, left her feeling -- in her own words, "moved, grateful . and, dare I say . hopeful!".
The symposium is unique in that it brings together doctors, scientists, advocates, meso patients and families to learn from each other and exchange research results, study findings, and review progress. MARF Director of Communications, and 4 year pleural meso survivor, Klaus Brauch, stated that "the most important sign of progress for me was that we are now talking about second-line treatments, something of great interest to those of us concerned about recurrences. A few years ago just surviving first-line treatment was an achievement." MARF, which has awarded over two million dollars of meso research funding, continues to be the only independent non-profit organization actively working to eradicate meso as a life-ending disease.
Attendees were able to meet and ask questions of some of the world's leading meso experts. Ferrero commented that "the ability to interact with the medical community on such an informal level was unique. I came back with several leads for my mom." In addition, over thirty meso patients, including numerous long-term survivors, were in attendance. Ferrero found meeting them to be "uplifting," and when she met the dedicated staff of MARF she found them to be "clearly devoted to curing this disease.".
The symposium also featured presentation of the Pioneer Award, an award MARF introduced this year to honor companies that have made substantial contributions to the field of meso research. Alfacell CEO Kuslima Shogen, one of the recipients, stated that "it is a great honor to receive one of the first MARF Pioneer Awards," and promised to "continue to work with [MARF] on the mission to find a cure." Other companies recognized with the Pioneer Award were Eli Lilly, Merck, Biogen Idec, Fujirebio Diagnostics, Genentech and Novartis.
MARF also held a poignant tribute ceremony dedicated to the lives and memory of meso patients lost to the cancer. Against the backdrop of a huge memorial wall, the names of the deceased were read by loved ones and candles were lit to commemorate their lives and their presence in spirit with the mission to cure the disease. Break out sessions for care givers, for patients, and for the bereaved allowed each one to focus on the specific needs of their group and exchange concerns in a safe and nurturing environment.
This year's winner of MARF's annual "Congressman Bruce Vento Hope Builder Award" was none other than the founder of MARF, Roger Worthington, without whose vision and hard work over the last six years neither MARF nor this unique symposium would exist. The awarded was presented by MARF Board of Directors member Susan Vento. Her husband, Minnesota congressman Bruce Vento -- who died from meso in 2000, was beloved for his work to build hope for overlooked communities. Worthington was honored for working, in much the same way, to create hope for the overlooked community of meso patients and those at risk by focusing on the need for effective treatments. The gala reception featured a stirring performance by recording artist Jordan Zevon, whose father, musician and composer Warren Zevon, died of mesothelioma in 2003.
The symposium was made possible through the generosity of financial supporters Eli Lilly, Simmons Cooper, Waters and Kraus, Stanley, Mandel and Iola, Bergman and Frockt, The David Law Firm, Merck, Alfacell Corporation, and Fujirebio Diagnostics. Attendees, whether patients, doctors, caregivers or industry executives, were all moved by the tributes, inspired by the presentations and energized by the resolve of presenters, the organizers and the audience to continue to fight for a cure for this terrible cancer. Planning for next year's symposium is already underway, and details should be announced soon.
For further information visit www.marf.org, or contact MARF Executive Director Chris Hahn (c-hahn@marf.org, 805.560.8942), or MARF Communications Director Klaus Brauch (k-brauch@marf.org, 714.969.1481).
Did you know?
Fresh evidence of progress in the diagnosis and treatment of an aggressive asbestos-related cancer was the highlight of the Second International Symposium on Cancerous Mesothelioma last week. Long considered lethal, meso is a tumor that invades the linings of the lungs, abdomen, heart or testicles. The Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation (MARF) organizes the annual symposium, held this year in Las Vegas Nevada, to unite the meso community and focus on curing the disease.
View the original article here

Jury Finds Chrysotile Asbestos Causes Rare Peritoneal Mesothelioma

A jury awarded over $1.9 million to a 71-year-old retired sheet metal worker, Genaro Garcia, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma from his prior on-the-job exposure to asbestos (Genaro Garcia and Dalia Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation, SF Superior Court, #418098). Peritoneal mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer that first attacks the membranes lining the stomach. This fatal disease is almost always caused by asbestos exposure.
The defendant, Duro Dyne Corporation, is a former manufacturer and distributor of asbestos-containing flex HVAC duct connectors and duct sealer used for sheet metal duct connections. Mr. Garcia worked with Duro Dyne Corporation's asbestos-containing sheet metal products throughout his 48-year career, but was never advised to wear any form of respiratory protection. Experts testified that he was exposed to hazardous levels of asbestos, and that each exposure was a substantial factor that contributed to his risk of developing an asbestos-related disease.
Mr. Garcia learned that he had peritoneal mesothelioma in late 2002. After over two years of treatment with chemotherapy, including Alimta®, his cancer is currently in a temporary state of remission. Mr. Garcia traveled with his wife by car from Whittier, California, to testify at the San Francisco trial. He was unable to travel by plane due to the severe side effects of his chemotherapy regime.
The verdict against Duro Dyne Corporation consisted of $325,369 for past and future medical expenses, $530,250 for lost earning capacity, and $1.05 million in non-economic damages. Non-economic damages included $300,000 to Mrs. Garcia for loss of consortium.
"We are grateful that the jury rejected the defense claims that chrysotile asbestos does not cause all mesothelioma, including peritoneal, and that Mr. Garcia is somehow cured of this terrible and entirely preventable disease. Only in a courtroom would you hear such things," said Mr. Garcia's attorney, Gilbert Purcell, after the verdict.
Gilbert Purcell and Crystal Howard of Brayton Purcell in Novato, California, represented plaintiffs Genaro and Delia Garcia at trial. Duro Dyne Corporation was represented at trial by James Sinunu and Thomas Trapani of Adams Nye Sinunu Bruni Becht LLP of San Francisco, CA.
About Brayton Purcell
For over 20 years, Brayton Purcell has helped clients protect their legal rights in the face of devastating losses such as illness, injuries, and harm to family members. The law firm enjoys a national reputation for the high quality of its personal injury and product liability work, particularly in the area of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related cancers. For more information, call 415-898-1555 or visit our firm web site at http://www.braytonlaw.com. For mesothelioma legal and medical news as well as information about mesothelioma diagnosis and treatment, see our specialty web site, Mesothelioma Network, at http://www.mesotheliomasite.com.
Did you know?
A jury awarded over $1.9 million to a 71-year-old retired sheet metal worker, Genaro Garcia, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma from his prior on-the-job exposure to asbestos (Genaro Garcia and Dalia Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation, SF Superior Court, #418098). Peritoneal mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer that first attacks the membranes lining the stomach. This fatal disease is almost always caused by asbestos exposure.
View the original article here

Removing Asbestos Floor Tiles

By Maria Faith
Different materials and compounds have already been tested in order to improve the qualities of modern-day homes and buildings. However, not all of these compounds are actually safe and risk-free. Some materials that are used for building homes could actually harm you and your family without any warning. If you do not want to expose yourself and your loved ones to these hazardous compounds, you should know some things about two of the most common household toxins - lead paint and asbestos.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
By Rofiq Hidayat
Someone who is suffering from a disease not to mention the disease mesothelioma, should be able to regulate emotions. And should be more aware that the pressure of unbridled emotion and continue to accumulate can cause a variety of physical ailments.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
By Jonathan Potkins
Learn about indoor air pollution and ways to get rid of it. We all can do little things that will make our homes cleaner and safer.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
By Robert Thatcher
Asbestos was once used widely in commercial and residential building projects. It is a strong substance that is even stronger than steel. It also is unaffected by heat, chemicals and does not conduct electricity.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
View the original article here

Symptoms Of Lymphoma

By Maria Faith
Different materials and compounds have already been tested in order to improve the qualities of modern-day homes and buildings. However, not all of these compounds are actually safe and risk-free. Some materials that are used for building homes could actually harm you and your family without any warning. If you do not want to expose yourself and your loved ones to these hazardous compounds, you should know some things about two of the most common household toxins - lead paint and asbestos.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
By Rofiq Hidayat
Someone who is suffering from a disease not to mention the disease mesothelioma, should be able to regulate emotions. And should be more aware that the pressure of unbridled emotion and continue to accumulate can cause a variety of physical ailments.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
By Jonathan Potkins
Learn about indoor air pollution and ways to get rid of it. We all can do little things that will make our homes cleaner and safer.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
By Robert Thatcher
Asbestos was once used widely in commercial and residential building projects. It is a strong substance that is even stronger than steel. It also is unaffected by heat, chemicals and does not conduct electricity.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
View the original article here

Mesothelioma - legal history of mesothelioma

The first lawsuit against asbestos manufacturers was brought in 1929. The parties settled that lawsuit, and as part of the agreement, the attorneys agreed not to pursue further cases. It was not until 1960 that an article published by Wagner et al in 1960 first officially established mesothelioma as a disease arising from exposure to crocidolite asbestos. The article referred to over 30 case studies of people who had suffered from mesothelioma in South Africa. Some exposures were transient and some were mine workers. In 1962 Dr McNulty reported the first diagnosed case of malignant mesothelioma in an Australian asbestos worker. The worker had worked in the mill at the asbestos mine in Wittenoom from 1948 to 1950.
In the town of Wittenoom, asbestos-containing mine waste was used to cover schoolyards and playgrounds. In 1965 an article in the British Journal of Industrial Medicine established that people who lived in the neighbourhoods of asbestos factories and mines, but did not work in them, had contracted mesothelioma.
Despite proof that the dust associated with asbestos mining and milling causes asbestos related disease, mining began at Wittenoom in 1943 and continued until 1966. It is difficult to understand why the mine and mill was allowed to initially open and operate without adequate risk control measures; and why nothing was done to force the owner (CSR) to clean them up, adopt safer work practices or close down their operations.
In 1974 the first public warnings of the dangers of blue asbestos were published in a cover story called "Is this Killer in Your Home?" in Australia's Bulletin magazine. In 1978 the Western Australian Government decided to phase out the town of Wittenoom, following the publication of a Health Dept. booklet, "The Health Hazard at Wittenoom", containing the results of air sampling and an appraisal of worldwide medical information.
By 1979 the first writs for negligence related to Wittenoom were issued against CSR and its subsidiary ABA, and the Asbestos Diseases Society was formed to represent the Wittenoom victims.
View the original article here

Lung Disease Lawyer

Lung Transplant Information & FactsLung transplant is surgery to replace one or both diseased lungs with healthy lungs from a human donor, and the number of successful operations has increased dramatically over the years. Nearly 1,200 patients received lung transplants in 2004 and this number is expected to grow in 2006. There is an unfilled demand for lung transplants and many patients needing the procedure are unable to obtain it.
Lung transplants are considered a final option for patients of chronic lung disease. Ailments that may be treated with a lung transplant include black lung disease, also known as CWP. This medical condition develops over time, is progressive in nature, and incurable.
If you believe you may be a candidate for a lung transplant, it is important that you know the facts. Speak with your physician about your condition and the benefits a lung transplant may have for you. Additionally, you owe it to yourself and your family to contact an attorney to discuss the causes of your medical state.
Often, hard-working laborers, like coal miners, fall victim to lung disease because they used unsafe respirators that leaked harmful dust. Depending on your circumstances, you may be able to obtain compensation from the respirator companies for your suffering and help secure a brighter future for your family.
View the original article here

New York City’s Inspection Scandal

New Yorkers are rightly alarmed at the ease with which an inspector who was licensed to test buildings and construction sites for lead or asbestos risks got away with filing hundreds of false reports for at least a decade. The Bloomberg administration says reforms that were already in progress when the deception was uncovered will make it less likely to happen in the future.
But the jaw-dropping scope of the fraud carried out by just one inspector raises legitimate concerns about city oversight. It also raises the possibility of collusion between builders and property owners and the inspectors they hire to perform legally required safety tests.
The inspector, Saverio Todaro, who was at one point certified by city, state and federal agencies, operated a company through which he claimed to perform environmental inspection and testing services, including lead clearance testing, asbestos air monitoring and asbestos inspection in the New York City area. Favorable reports allow property owners to certify that their apartments presented no lead risks to young children or that proposed demolition projects would be asbestos-free. That means they do not require special filings with the city or costly abatement efforts.
As William K. Rashbaum reported in The Times on Tuesday, Mr. Todaro submitted results for more than 200 buildings and apartments, including some renovated for the city’s affordable housing initiative, without performing a single test.
The city environmental agency suspended Mr. Todaro’s license in 2004 but failed to notify other public agencies for which he did asbestos-related work. As a result, he continued to file reports until 2008, when an employee of the city’s health department noticed a suspicious pattern in his work.
City officials say that they would notify other agencies of suspensions and irregularities in the future. The city also says it is well on the way to a system that will make it impossible for inspectors who have been suspended from filing subsequent reports.
City Hall should also consider strengthening and consolidating oversight of the testing regime, which currently is spread across several city agencies.
View the original article here

Defective Respirator Lawyer

Defective Respirators
A respirator is a device used in a variety of professions to enable workers to breath in a hostile or toxic environment. These pieces of vital equipment allow people to have purified air in areas where dangerous chemicals, organisms, or material could put them at risk. The workers who rely on their respirators trust them with their lives.
Unfortunately, defects in the manufacturing or design of the respirators can render them useless, greatly endangering the health and safety of the workers who need them to survive. Often these workers have no idea that their respirators have failed until it is too late.
MSA Respirator
The Mine Safety Appliances manufactures protective gear for a number of hazardous areas, including coal mining, asbestos working, and rock quarrying.
American Optical Respirator
Located in Southbridge, Massachusetts, American Optical makes a wide variety of industrial grade respirators, including a number of specialized asbestos masks.
Cabot Safety Respirator
Cabot Safety has a long track record of providing substandard safety equipment due to allegations of the failure of its products to adequately protect workers from asbestos fibers.
Welsh Norton Respirator
Welsh Norton makes a variety of respirators for industrial use, including the mining and use of asbestos. These respirators range from simple particle filters to multistage air scrubbers designed to eliminate foreign bodies.
Willson Respirator
Willson respirators have been used for a wide variety of purposes since 1978, including mining, hazardous waste management, and air purification purposes.
Moldex Respirator
This manufacturer of several popular forms of respiration devices has been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits on behalf of people and health professionals who have developed asbestos-related diseases like asbestosis.
If your faulty respirator caused you or someone you love to develop a serious medical condition such as asbestosis, silicosis, or black lung disease - you have rights. Depending on your situation, you may be able to collect financial compensation for your pain and suffering. Let a dedicated and experienced lawyer help you today get the answers that you deserve today.
The Law Firm of Steigerwalt & Associates is working to help victims of serious injury and death as a result of defective respirators.
View the original article here

Asbestos Siding Disposal

By Dave J Stevens
The process to remove popcorn ceiling material is quite easy but for the results wanted, the surface needs to be prepped. This way, when the new ceiling has been added, it would look amazing.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
By Allan Tan
Properly maintaining carpets help the carpet look better and last longer. Buying carpet that is stain resistant is always a good choice for keeping carpet maintain its good condition, but that doesn't make carpet maintenance is less important.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
By Eva Judge
Metal roofs are among the easiest to take care of and can last for many, many years. Despite their durability, though, they still require at least a little bit of regular, routine maintenance. If you own a metal roof, make sure that you are aware of the basics of taking care of it.
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
By Makenna Mary
Replacement fascias and soffits can help improve the overall appearance of a property. Cladding over the top of the existing wooden boards may be a cheaper alternative to a full replacement roofline, however is hiding the rot the best solution?
[READ FULL ARTICLE]
View the original article here

Guidant Recall

Guidant Defibrillator Recall Alert!
April 12, 2007
On April 12 th 2007, Boston Scientific/Guidant and the FDA recalled a subset of devices within the CONTAK RENEWAL 3 & 4, VITALITY and VITALITY 2 families. This new recall includes about 73,000 implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators and cardiac defibrillators due to faulty capacitors. While this recall is similar to the recall of May 2006, this time the failure modes and patient outcomes differ. The capacitors have been causing accelerated battery depletion and reducing the time between the elective replacement indicators and end of life to less than three months.

Guidant Recall
The Food and Drug Administration has announced that it has recently received reports about new patient deaths caused by a fatal complication linked to short circuiting in defibrillator and pacemaker heart devices manufactured by Guidant Corporation, which brings the number of known deaths associated with the deadly defect to seven.
On June 17, 2005, Guidant Corporation recalled its cardiac defibrillators implanted in 50,000 patients around the world due to potentially fatal malfunctions of the devices. There are approximately 38,000 patients in the United States with Guidant defibrillators, which reports indicate have failed 45 times and are responsible for at least two deaths since May 30th.
The Guidant Defibrillator Recall includes the following models of cardiac defibrillators:
• Guidant Prizm 2 DR
• Guidant Contak Renewal and Contak Renewal 2
• Guidant Ventak Prizm AVT
• Guidant Vitality AVT
• Guidant Renewal 3 AVT and Renewal 4 AVT ICDs

Ventak Prizm 2 DR | Contak Renewal | Ventak Prizm AVT | Vitality AVT | Renewal 3 AVT | Renewal 4 AVT
Guidant cardiac defibrillators are small devices implanted into the body to regulate the heartbeat in people with risk of heart problems. Small computers detect an irregular heartbeat and shock the heart into the proper rhythm, but critical wiring errors in Guidant defibrillators may cause a short circuit which can overload their delicate wiring. Guidant Prizm AVT, Vitality AVT and Renewal AVT can be serviced at a doctor’s office to reduce this risk, but Prizm 2 DR and Contak Renewal must be replaced in order to eliminate potential hazards. Those at the greatest risk should immediately consult their doctors and continue to have checkups every three months to ensure that the devices are still working properly.
The Food and Drug Administration released a statement stating that they did not require a Guidant Defibrillator Recall, but that they nevertheless supported the decision to address such serious allegations. The fact that this issue was finally addressed is of small comfort to the 50,000 people who continue to live in constant fear that their life-saving medical equipment may fail them when they need it the most.
Guidant Corp knew that there were problems in its Prizm 2 DR model and continued to market it...
Guidant Corp knew that there were problems in its Prizm 2 DR model and continued to market it, but demanded a total redesign of the unit. The company knew the model had failed a small number of times before 2002, but claimed that future revisions would make it safer. Doctors then discovered that Contak Renewal defibrillators built before August 26th, 2004 demonstrated a large risk of shorting out and failing to function properly. Only when presented with two such problems did Guidant act in the best interest of the public and offer to recall and service their defective products. If you or your loved one uses Guidant brand defibrillators, you could be in serious danger. Consult your doctor immediately, but then contact our lawyers right away.
The most common terms people have used in Google to find this web page include: Defibrillator death, Defibrillator malfunction, Defibrillator short circuit, Defibrillator heart attack.
Others used variations like: Defibrillator, Defibrillator recall, Defibrillator lawsuit, Defibrillator lawyer.
View the original article here

Mesothelioma - asbestos, cancer, find out about mesothelioma

This website aims to provide you with easy to understand and accurate answers to the questions you have about mesothelioma.
We realise that there are many resources on the internet which inform, guide, advise and bombard you with technical details about mesothelioma and it became obvious to us that there was a real need for straightforward information to help you become better informed about mesothelioma.
Information is power. Your experience of mesothelioma can only be made easier if you understand all about it. We seek to explain what you need to know clearly and simply. We have done our best to translate technical and medical terms into normal language that everyone can take in, and we have only included relevant facts so that you don’t have to wade through too many pages.
Research into mesothelioma is going on all the time and we are keen to bring you details of ground-breaking treatments as they become available, so click here to bookmark this page. As soon as we find something new that’s special we will tell you about it here.
In addition, we have access to the enormous Amazon databases, which have allowed us to search for other relevant items that might interest you on the subject of mesothelioma. This is already done for you on this site to save you the time and effort required.
Welcome. We hope that this site helps you.
View the original article here

Watching for Symptoms of Mesothelioma

Mesothelioma is a serious disease, and 99% of all cases are attributable to exposure to asbestos. It's a disease that can remain dormant for as long as 20 to 50 years before it starts taking its devastating toll on a person's health and life. Although the cancer may show up in less than 20 years in some cases, most people don't develop any symptoms until somewhere around 35 years after exposure. Early symptoms may not ring any bells, either, because they may be as basic as general pain in the chest or back. Therefore, anyone who ever worked in an environment where there were asbestos fibers needs to be on guard for the rest of their lives.
Mesothelioma patients have been diagnosed as having cancer cells surrounding their lungs or abdominal organs or inside their ribcages. While even a little exposure to asbestos could cause the disease, it's far more likely to occur in people who were exposed over longer periods of time. It's real possible that you aren't even aware that you were ever working around asbestos, because it was common for employers back then to withhold from their employees the information that was coming out regarding asbestos exposure. Some examples of people who may have been innocently exposed prior to the 1970s include construction workers or those who were in the Navy.
There are a number of materials you could have been exposed to that contained asbestos, because asbestos was widely-used prior to the middle of the 1970s when the first reports of the damages it could cause were released. Before that time almost every kind of insulation contained asbestos, including insulation used in homes, around pipes, for fire-proofing, and in boilers. Powdered forms of plaster, cement, and joint compounds that were used to insulate contained asbestos, too, and since using them caused employees to breathe in a lot of their dust, they have proved to be a major source of asbestos exposure.
People who worked in the following occupations prior to the mid 1970s need to be alert for the symptoms of Mesothelioma: * Paper mills * Brake and clutch shoe manufacture * Boilermakers * Electrical and carpentry workers or bricklayers * Insulation - manufacture or installation * Steel refineries and other steel industries * Shipyard workers * Maintenance workers
Even if you did work in any of these occupations, that's not a sure sign you're going to come down with Mesothelioma. However, it does put you at a higher risk, and you should let your physician know that you were exposed. He may recommend that you take some tests in order to determine if the asbestos is having any effect on you. He may want to do a complete physical, have x-rays taken of your chest and abdomen, and ask you to take pulmonary function tests. In some cases CT scans or MRIs are advisable. All of this testing may well find no evidence of Mesothelioma, but at least you'll know for sure which can be a relief.
If you should happen to be diagnosed with Mesothelioma sometime in the future, you'll want to hire a lawyer who specializes in this type of litigation to file a claim against your employer. You may be eligible for restitution if it can be proven that your employer was in any way negligent in providing you with information or safety equipment that could have prevented your illness.
Tagged as: asbestos, asbestos exposure, evidence of Mesothelioma, Mesothelioma, Mesothelioma patients, symptoms of mesothelioma
View the original article here
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Blog Archive